Advanced 3D-Printing Bioinks for Articular Cartilage Repair

Qiushi Liang, Yuanzhu Ma, Xudong Yao, Wei Wei

Article ID: 511
Vol 8, Issue 3, 2022, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 410 (Abstract) 110 (PDF)

Abstract


Chondral lesions caused by stressors, such as injury or inflammation, lead to osteoarthritis (OA). OA is a degenerative joint disease that has become a challenge worldwide. As the articular cartilage is incapable of self-regeneration due to the absence of vessels and nerves, novel cartilage repair techniques are urgently needed. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, which allows the precise control of internal architecture and geometry of printed scaffolds, has stepped up to be a promising strategy in cartilage restoration. With regards to 3D bioprinting, bioinks with proper chemical and mechanical properties play one of the most critical roles in designing successful cartilage tissue constructs. In particular, hydrogels as 3D hydrophilic cross-linked polymer networks are highly recommended as bioinks because of their fine biocompatibility, easy fabrication, and tunable mechanical strength. Herein, we highlight the widely used polymers for hydrogel preparation and further provide a non-exhaustive overview of various functional modified additives (such as cells, drugs, bioactive factors and ceramic) to exploit the unique properties suitable for bioprinted cartilage. Finally, a prospective on future development for 3D-bioprinting in cartilage repair is elucidated in this review.


Keywords


Osteoarthritis; Hydrogels; Silk fibroin; Collagen; Polyethylene glycol

Full Text:

PDF

References


Messina OD, Wilman MV, Neira LF, 2019, Nutrition, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Metabolism. Aging Clin Exp Res, 31:807–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01191-w

Lagarto JL, Nickdel MB, Kelly DJ, et al., 2020, Autofluorescence Lifetime Reports Cartilage Damage in Osteoarthritis. Sci Rep, 10:2154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59219-5

Gourdine J, 2019, Review of Nonsurgical Treatment Guidelines for Lower Extremity Osteoarthritis. Orthop Nurs, 38:303–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/nor.0000000000000591

Wei W, Ma Y, Yao X, et al., 2021, Advanced Hydrogels for the Repair of Cartilage Defects and Regeneration. Bioact Mater, 6:998–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.030

Glyn-Jones S, Palmer AJ, Agricola R, et al., 2015, Osteoarthritis. Lancet, 386:376–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60802-3

Sacitharan PK, 2019, Ageing and Osteoarthritis. In: Harris JR, Korolchuk VI, editors. Biochemistry and Cell Biology of Ageing: Part II Clinical Science. Singapore: Springer. p123–59.

Guo T, Lembong J, Zhang LG, et al., 2017, Three-Dimensional Printing Articular Cartilage: Recapitulating the Complexity of Native Tissue. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 23:225–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0316

Xue JX, Gong YY, Zhou GD, et al., 2012, Chondrogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Induced by Acellular Cartilage Sheets. Biomaterials, 33:5832–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.054

Zhang YS, Khademhosseini A, 2017, Advances in Engineering Hydrogels. Science, 356:eaaf3627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3627

Mei Q, Rao J, Bei HP, et al., 2021, 3D Bioprinting Photo-Crosslinkable Hydrogels for Bone and Cartilage Repair. Int J Bioprint, 7:367. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i3.367

Marques CF, Diogo GS, Pina S, et al., 2019, Collagen based Bioinks for Hard Tissue Engineering Applications: A Comprehensive Review. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 30:32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6234-x

Gillispie GJ, Han A, Uzun-Per M, et al., 2020, The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes. Tissue Eng Part A, 26:1349–58. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0210

Diamantides N, Dugopolski C, Blahut E, et al., 2019, High Density Cell Seeding Affects the Rheology and Printability of Collagen Bioinks. Biofabrication, 11:045016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab3524

Schwartz R, Malpica M, Thompson GL, et al., 2020, Cell Encapsulation in Gelatin Bioink Impairs 3D Bioprinting Resolution. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 103:103524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103524

Hsu EL, Stock SR, 2020, Growth Factors, Carrier Materials, and Bone Repair. Handb Exp Pharmacol, 262:121–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2020_371

Chen L, Liu J, Guan M, et al., 2020, Growth Factor and Its Polymer Scaffold-Based Delivery System for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Int J Nanomedicine, 15:6097–111. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.S249829

Shirahama H, Lee BH, Tan LP, et al., 2016, Precise Tuning of Facile One-Pot Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Synthesis. Sci Rep, 6:31036. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31036

Chimene D, Kaunas R, Gaharwar AK, 2020, Hydrogel Bioink Reinforcement for Additive Manufacturing: A Focused Review of Emerging Strategies. Adv Mater, 32:e1902026. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902026

Bertlein S, Brown G, Lim KS, et al., 2017, Thiol-Ene Clickable Gelatin: A Platform Bioink for Multiple 3D Biofabrication Technologies. Adv Mater, 29:44. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703404

Liao J, Qu Y, Chu B, et al., 2015, Biodegradable CSMA/PECA/Graphene Porous Hybrid Scaffold for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Sci Rep, 5:9879. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09879

Cui X, Li J, Hartanto Y, et al., 2020, Advances in Extrusion 3D Bioprinting: A Focus on Multicomponent Hydrogel-Based Bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater, 9:e1901648. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901648

Zhang YS, Haghiashtiani G, Hübscher T, et al., 2021, 3D Extrusion Bioprinting. Nat Rev Methods Prim, 1:75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00073-8

Daly AC, Freeman FE, Gonzalez-Fernandez T, et al., 2017, 3D Bioprinting for Cartilage and Osteochondral Tissue Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 6:22. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700298

Willson K, Atala A, Yoo JJ, 2021, Bioprinting Au Natural: The Biologics of Bioinks. Biomolecules, 11:1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111593

Zhang J, Hu Q, Wang S, et al., 2020, Digital Light Processing Based Three-dimensional Printing for Medical Applications. Int J Bioprint, 6:242. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.242

Petta D, D’Amora U, Ambrosio L, et al., 2020, Hyaluronic Acid as a Bioink for Extrusion-based 3D Printing. Biofabrication, 12:032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8752

Kim SH, Kim DY, Lim TH, et al., 2020, Silk Fibroin Bioinks for Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D Bioprinting. In: Chun HJ, Reis RL, Motta A, Khang G. editors. Bioinspired Biomaterials: Advances in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Singapore: Springer. p53-66.

Antich C, de Vicente J, Jiménez G, et al., 2020, Bio-inspired Hydrogel Composed of Hyaluronic Acid and Alginate as a Potential Bioink for 3D Bioprinting of Articular Cartilage Engineering Constructs. Acta Biomater, 106:114–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.046

Fraser JR, Laurent TC, Laurent UB, 1997, Hyaluronan: Its Nature, Distribution, Functions and Turnover. J Intern Med, 242:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00170.x

Evanko SP, Angello JC, Wight TN, 1999, Formation of Hyaluronan and Versican-rich Pericellular Matrix is Required for Proliferation and Migration of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 19:1004–13. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.19.4.1004

Abatangelo G, Vindigni V, Avruscio G, et al., 2020, Hyaluronic Acid: Redefining its Role. Cells, 9:1743. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071743

Burdick JA, Prestwich GD, 2011, Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Adv Mater, 23:H41–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201003963

Shu XZ, Ahmad S, Liu Y, et al., 2006, Synthesis and Evaluation of Injectable, In Situ Crosslinkable Synthetic Extracellular Matrices for Tissue Engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A, 79:902–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30831

Vanderhooft JL, Mann BK, Prestwich GD, 2007, Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Thiol-reactive Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Cross-linkers for Extracellular-matrix-mimetic Biomaterials. Biomacromolecules, 8:2883–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703564

Serban MA, Prestwich GD, 2007, Synthesis of Hyaluronan Haloacetates and Biology of Novel Cross-linker-free Synthetic Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels. Biomacromolecules, 8:2821–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm700595s

Pouyani T, Prestwich GD, 1994, Functionalized Derivatives of Hyaluronic Acid Oligosaccharides: Drug Carriers and Novel Biomaterials. Bioconjug Chem, 5:339–47. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc00028a010

Darr A, Calabro A, 2009, Synthesis and Characterization of Tyramine-based Hyaluronan Hydrogels. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 20:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3540-0

Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current Advances and Future Perspectives in Extrusion-based Bioprinting. Biomaterials, 76:321–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015

Kesti M, Müller M, Becher J, et al., 2015, A Versatile Bioink for Three-dimensional Printing of Cellular Scaffolds Based on Thermally and Photo-triggered Tandem Gelation. Acta Biomater, 11:162–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.033

Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, de Ruijter M, et al., 2017, 3D Bioprinting of Methacrylated Hyaluronic Acid (MeHA) Hydrogel with Intrinsic Osteogenicity. PLoS One, 12:e0177628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177628

Lin H, Beck AM, Shimomura K, et al., 2019, Optimization of Photocrosslinked Gelatin/hyaluronic Acid Hybrid Scaffold for the Repair of Cartilage Defect. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 13:1418–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2883

Titan A, Schär M, Hutchinson I, et al., 2020, Growth Factor Delivery to a Cartilage-Cartilage Interface Using Platelet-Rich Concentrates on a Hyaluronic Acid Scaffold. Arthroscopy, 36:1431–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.12.004

Qi X, Tong X, Pan W, et al., 2021, Recent Advances in Polysaccharide-based Adsorbents for Wastewater Treatment. J Cleaner Prod, 315:128221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128221

Axpe E, Oyen ML, 2016, Applications of Alginate-Based Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci, 17:1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121976

Hadley DJ, Silva EA, 2019, Thaw-Induced Gelation of Alginate Hydrogels for Versatile Delivery of Therapeutics. Ann Biomed Eng, 47:1701–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02282-5

Kabir W, Di Bella C, Choong PF, et al., 2020, Assessment of Native Human Articular Cartilage: A Biomechanical Protocol. Cartilage, 13:427S–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603520973240

Yang X, Lu Z, Wu H, et al., 2018, Collagen-alginate as Bioink for Three-dimensional (3D) Cell Printing Based Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 83:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.09.002

Rastogi P, Kandasubramanian B, 2019, Review of Alginatebased Hydrogel Bioprinting for Application in Tissue Engineering. Biofabrication, 11:042001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e

Reakasame S, Boccaccini AR, 2018, Oxidized Alginate-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review. Biomacromolecules, 19:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01331

Luo Y, Li Y, Qin X, et al., 2018, 3D Printing of Concentrated Alginate/Gelatin Scaffolds with Homogeneous Nano Apatite Coating for Bone Tissue Engineering. Mater Des, 146:12–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.002

Fedorovich NE, Schuurman W, Wijnberg HM, et al., 2012, Biofabrication of Osteochondral Tissue Equivalents by Printing Topologically Defined, Cell-laden Hydrogel Scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 18:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0060

Bakarich SE, Gorkin R 3rd, in het Panhuis M, et al., 2014, Three-dimensional Printing Fiber Reinforced Hydrogel Composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 6:15998–6006. https://doi.org/10.1021/am503878d

Kundu J, Shim JH, Jang J, et al., 2015, An Additive Manufacturing-based PCL-alginate-chondrocyte Bioprinted Scaffold for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 9:1286–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1682

Kosik-Kozioł A, Costantini M, Bolek T, et al., 2017, PLA Short Sub-micron Fiber Reinforcement of 3D Bioprinted Alginate Constructs for Cartilage Regeneration. Biofabrication, 9:044105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa90d7

Olate-Moya F, Arens L, Wilhelm M, et al., 2020, Chondroinductive Alginate-Based Hydrogels Having Graphene Oxide for 3D Printed Scaffold Fabrication. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12:4343–57. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b22062

Schwarz S, Kuth S, Distler T, et al., 2020, 3D Printing and Characterization of Human Nasoseptal Chondrocytes Laden Dual Crosslinked Oxidized Alginate-gelatin Hydrogels for Cartilage Repair Approaches. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 116:111189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111189

Depalle B, Qin Z, Shefelbine SJ, et al., 2015, Influence of Cross-link Structure, Density and Mechanical Properties in the Mesoscale Deformation Mechanisms of Collagen Fibrils. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 52:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.07.008

Bellis SL, 2011, Advantages of RGD Peptides for Directing Cell Association with Biomaterials. Biomaterials, 32:4205–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029

Adamiak K, Sionkowska A, 2020, Current Methods of Collagen Cross-linking: Review. Int J Biol Macromol, 161:550–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.075

Lee H, Yang GH, Kim M, et al., 2018, Fabrication of Micro/Nanoporous Collagen/dECM/Silk-fibroin Biocomposite Scaffolds Using a Low Temperature 3D Printing Process for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 84:140–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.013

Shim JH, Jang KM, Hahn SK, et al., 2016, Three-dimensional Bioprinting of Multilayered Constructs Containing Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration in the Rabbit Knee Joint. Biofabrication, 8:014102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/014102

Stratesteffen H, Köpf M, Kreimendahl F, et al., 2017, GelMA collagen Blends Enable Drop-on-demand 3D Printablility and Promote Angiogenesis. Biofabrication, 9:045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa857c

Lee J, Yeo M, Kim W, et al., 2018, Development of a Tannic Acid Cross-linking Process for Obtaining 3D Porous Cellladen Collagen Structure. Int J Biol Macromol, 110:497–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017

Wang C, Yue H, Huang W, et al., 2020, Cryogenic 3D Printing of Heterogeneous Scaffolds with Gradient Mechanical Strengths and Spatial Delivery of Osteogenic Peptide/TGF-β1 for Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration. Biofabrication, 12:025030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab7ab5

Tong X, Pan W, Su T, et al., 2020, Recent Advances in Natural Polymer-based Drug Delivery Systems. React Funct Polym, 148:104501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104501

Catoira MC, Fusaro L, Di Francesco D, et al., 2019, Overview of Natural Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine Applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 30:115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6318-7

Kim HJ, Kim MK, Lee KH, et al., 2017, Effect of Degumming Methods on Structural Characteristics and Properties of Regenerated Silk. Int J Biol Macromol, 104:294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.019

Rasheed T, Bilal M, Zhao Y, et al., 2019, Physiochemical Characteristics and Bone/Cartilage Tissue Engineering Potentialities of Protein-based Macromolecules a Review. Int J Biol Macromol, 121:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018

Singh YP, Bandyopadhyay A, Mandal BB, 2019, 3D Bioprinting Using Cross-Linker-Free Silk-Gelatin Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 11:33684–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b11644

Vepari C, Kaplan DL, 2007, Silk as a Biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci, 32:991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013

Shi W, Sun M, Hu X, et al., 2017, Structurally and Functionally Optimized Silk-Fibroin-Gelatin Scaffold Using 3D Printing to Repair Cartilage Injury In Vitro and In Vivo. Adv Mater, 29:1701089. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701089

Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM, et al., 2018, Precisely Printable and Biocompatible Silk Fibroin Bioink for Digital Light Processing 3D Printing. Nat Commun, 9:1620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y

Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al., 2015, Synthesis, Properties, and Biomedical Applications of Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels. Biomaterials, 73:254–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045

Chen YC, Lin RZ, Qi H, et al., 2012, Functional Human Vascular Network Generated in Photocrosslinkable Gelatin Methacrylate Hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater, 22:2027–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201101662

Koshy ST, Ferrante TC, Lewin SA, et al., 2014, Injectable, Porous, and Cell-responsive Gelatin Cryogels. Biomaterials, 35:2477–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.044

Wei D, Xiao W, Sun J, et al., 2015, A Biocompatible Hydrogel with Improved Stiffness and Hydrophilicity for Modular Tissue Engineering Assembly. J Mater Chem B, 3:2753–63. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb00129c

Liu Y, Chan-Park MB, 2010, A Biomimetic Hydrogel Based on Methacrylated Dextran-graft-lysine and Gelatin for 3D Smooth Muscle Cell Culture. Biomaterials, 31:1158–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009

Wang Y, Ma M, Wang J, et al., 2018, Development of a Photo-Crosslinking, Biodegradable GelMA/PEGDA Hydrogel for Guided Bone Regeneration Materials. Materials (Basel), 11:1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081345

Mobasheri A, Rayman MP, Gualillo O, et al., 2017, The Role of Metabolism in the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 13:302–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.50

Chen P, Zheng L, Wang Y, et al., 2019, Desktop stereolithography 3D Printing of a Radially Oriented Extracellular Matrix/Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome Bioink for Osteochondral Defect Regeneration. Theranostics, 9:2439–59. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.31017

Lam T, Dehne T, Krüger JP, et al., 2019, Photopolymerizable Gelatin and Hyaluronic Acid for Stereolithographic 3D Bioprinting of Tissue-engineered Cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 107:2649–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34354

Luo C, Xie R, Zhang J, et al., 2020, Low-Temperature Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Cartilage Engineered with Gelatin Methacrylamide. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 26:306–16. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2020.0053

Irmak G, Gümüşderelioğlu M, 2020, Photo-activated Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)-based Patient-specific Bio-ink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Biomed Mater, 15:0650. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ab9e46

Chin SY, Poh YC, Kohler AC, et al., 2018, An Additive Manufacturing Technique for the Facile and Rapid Fabrication of Hydrogel-based Micromachines with Magnetically Responsive Components. J Vis Exp, 137:56727. https://doi.org/10.3791/56727

Arcaute K, Mann B, Wicker R, 2010, Stereolithography of Spatially Controlled Multi-material Bioactive Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Scaffolds. Acta Biomater, 6:1047–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.017

Bryant SJ, Anseth KS, 2002, Hydrogel Properties Influence ECM Production by Chondrocytes Photo encapsulated in Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res, 59:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1217

Sharma B, Fermanian S, Gibson M, et al., 2013, Human Cartilage Repair with a Photoreactive Adhesive-hydrogel Composite. Sci Transl Med, 5:167ra166. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3004838

Gaharwar AK, Dammu SA, Canter JM, et al., 2011, Highly Extensible, Tough, and Elastomeric Nanocomposite Hydrogels from Poly(Ethylene Glycol) and Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules, 12:1641–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm200027z

Gaharwar AK, Kishore V, Rivera C, et al., 2012, Physically Crosslinked Nanocomposites from Silicate-crosslinked PEO: Mechanical Properties and Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Macromol Biosci, 12:779–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201100508

Zhang W, Lian Q, Li D, et al., 2014, Cartilage Repair and Subchondral Bone Migration Using 3D Printing Osteochondral Composites: A One-year-period Study in Rabbit Trochlea. Biomed Res Int, 2014:746138. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/746138

Treccani L, Klein TY, Meder F, et al., 2013, Functionalized Ceramics for Biomedical, Biotechnological and Environmental Applications. Acta Biomater, 9:7115–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.036

Gao G, Schilling AF, Hubbell K, et al., 2015, Improved Properties of Bone and Cartilage Tissue from 3D Inkjet bioprinted Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Simultaneous Deposition and Photocrosslinking in PEG-GelMA. Biotechnol Lett, 37:2349–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1921-2

Qiao Z, Lian M, Han Y, et al., 2021, Bioinspired Stratified Electrowritten Fiber-reinforced Hydrogel Constructs with Layer-specific Induction Capacity for Functional Osteochondral Regeneration. Biomaterials, 266:120385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120385

Kade JC, Dalton PD, 2021, Polymers for Melt Electrowriting. Adv Healthc Mater, 10:e2001232. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001232

Jiang S, Guo W, Tian G, et al., 2020, Clinical Application Status of Articular Cartilage Regeneration Techniques: Tissue-Engineered Cartilage Brings New Hope. Stem Cells Int, 2020:5690252. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5690252

Shive MS, Hoemann CD, Restrepo A, et al., 2006, BSTCarGel: In Situ ChondroInduction for Cartilage Repair. Oper Techn Orthop, 16:271–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.oto.2006.08.001

Sahana TG, Rekha PD, 2018, Biopolymers: Applications in Wound Healing and Skin Tissue Engineering. Mol Biol Rep, 45:2857–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4296-3

Daly AC, Critchley SE, Rencsok EM, et al., 2016, A Comparison of Different Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting of Fibrocartilage and Hyaline Cartilage. Biofabrication, 8:045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045002

Dhand AP, Galarraga JH, Burdick JA, 2021, Enhancing Biopolymer Hydrogel Functionality through Interpenetrating Networks. Trends Biotechnol, 39:519–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.08.007

Shojarazavi N, Mashayekhan S, Pazooki H, et al., 2021, Alginate/Cartilage Extracellular Matrix-based Injectable Interpenetrating Polymer Network Hydrogel for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. J Biomater Appl, 36:803–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/08853282211024020

D’Angelo M, Billings PC, Pacifici M, et al., 2001, Authentic Matrix Vesicles Contain Active Metalloproteases (MMP). A Role for Matrix Vesicle-associated MMP-13 in Activation of Transforming Growth Factor-beta. J Biol Chem, 276:11347–53. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M009725200

Jahangir S, Eglin D, Pötter N, et al., 2020, Inhibition of Hypertrophy and Improving Chondrocyte Differentiation by MMP-13 Inhibitor Small Molecule Encapsulated in Alginate chondroitin Sulfate-platelet Lysate Hydrogel. Stem Cell Res Ther, 11:436. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01930-1

Stefani RM, Barbosa S, Tan AR, et al., 2020, Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Promote Repair of Focal Articular Cartilage Defects with Engineered Osteochondral Constructs. Biotechnol Bioeng, 117:1584–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27287

Kino-Oka M, Maeda Y, Sato Y, et al., 2009, Morphological Evaluation of Chondrogenic Potency in Passaged Cell Populations. J Biosci Bioeng, 107:544–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2008.12.018

Večerić-Haler Ž, Cerar A, Perše M, 2017, (Mesenchymal) Stem Cell-Based Therapy in Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Animal Model: Risk of Immunogenicity and Tumorigenicity. Stem Cells Int, 2017:7304643. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7304643

Liu Y, Lin L, Zou R, et al., 2018, MSC-derived Exosomes Promote Proliferation and Inhibit Apoptosis of Chondrocytes via lncRNA-KLF3-AS1/miR-206/GIT1 Axis in Osteoarthritis. Cell Cycle, 17:2411–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2018.1526603

Liang Y, Xu X, Li X, et al., 2020, Chondrocyte-Targeted MicroRNA Delivery by Engineered Exosomes toward a Cell-Free Osteoarthritis Therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12:36938–47. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c10458




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i3.511

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s).

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/