Controlling Droplet Impact Velocity and Droplet Volume: Key Factors to Achieving High Cell Viability in Sub-Nanoliter Droplet-based Bioprinting

Wei Long Ng, Xi Huang, Viktor Shkolnikov, Guo Liang Goh, Ratima Suntornnond, Wai Yee Yeong

Article ID: 424
Vol 8, Issue 1, 2022, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 245 (Abstract) 79 (PDF)



Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting systems serve as advanced manufacturing platform for the precise deposition of cells and biomaterials at pre-defined positions. Among the various bioprinting techniques, the drop-on-demand jetting approach facilitates deposition of pico/nanoliter droplets of cells and materials for study of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Despite advances in the bioprinting systems, there is a poor understanding of how the viability of primary human cells within sub-nanoliter droplets is affected during the printing process. In this work, a thermal inkjet system is utilized to dispense sub-nanoliter cell-laden droplets, and two key factors – droplet impact velocity and droplet volume – are identified to have significant effect on the viability and proliferation of printed cells. An increase in the cell concentration results in slower impact velocity, which leads to higher viability of the printed cells and improves the printing outcome by mitigating droplet splashing. Furthermore, a minimum droplet volume of 20 nL per spot helps to mitigate evaporation-induced cell damage and maintain high viability of the printed cells within a printing duration of 2 min. Hence, controlling the droplet impact velocity and droplet volume in sub-nanoliter bioprinting is critical for viability and proliferation of printed human primary cells.


3D Bioprinting, 3D Printing, Biofabrication, Drop-on-demand printing, Sub-nanoliter cell printing

Full Text:



Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print Me An Organ! Why We Are Not There Yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97:101145.

Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85.

Lee JM, Ng WL, Yeong WY, 2019, Resolution and Shape in Bioprinting: Strategizing Towards Complex Tissue and Organ Printing. Appl Phys Rev, 6:011307.

Ng WL, Chan A, Ong YS, et al., 2020, Deep Learning for Fabrication and Maturation of 3D Bioprinted Tissues and Organs. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 15:340–58.

Wan AC, 2016, Recapitulating Cell-Cell Interactions for Organoid Construction-are Biomaterials Dispensable? Trends Biotechnol, 34:711–21.

Gruene M, Pflaum M, Hess C, et al., 2011, Laser Printing of Three-dimensional Multicellular Arrays for Studies of Cell-Cell and Cell-Environment Interactions. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 17:973–82.

Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Hydrogels for 3-D Bioprinting-based Tissue Engineering. In: Narayan R, editor. Rapid Prototyping of Biomaterials. Chapel Hill, NC: Elsevier, p183-204.

Kathawala MH, Ng WL, Liu D, et al., 2019, Healing of Chronic Wounds an Update of Recent Developments and Future Possibilities. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 25:429–44.

Rose JC, De Laporte L, 2018, Hierarchical Design of Tissue Regenerative Constructs. Adv Healthc Mater, 7:1701067.

Ng WL, Goh MH, Yeong WY, et al, 2018, Applying Macromolecular Crowding to 3D Bioprinting: Fabrication of 3D Hierarchical Porous Collagen-based Hydrogel Constructs. Biomater Sci, 6:562–74.

Lee JM, Suen SK, Ng WL, et al., 2020, Bioprinting of Collagen: Considerations, Potentials, and Applications. Macromol Biosci, 21:2000280.

Osidak EO, Kozhukhov VI, Osidak MS, et al., 2020, Collagen as Bioink for Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Bioprint, 6:270.

Ng WL, Ayi TC, Liu YC, et al., 2021, Fabrication and Characterization of 3D Bioprinted Triple-layered Human Alveolar Lung Models. Int J Bioprint, 7:332.

Lee JM, Sing SL, Tan EY, et al., 2016, Bioprinting in Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering: A Review. Int J Bioprint, 2:136–45.

Saunders RE, Derby B, 2014, Inkjet Printing Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering: Bioprinting. Int Mater Rev, 59:430–48.

Ng WL, Lee JM, Yeong WY, et al., 2017, Microvalve-based Bioprinting Process, Bio-inks and Applications. Biomater Sci, 5:632–47.

Ng WL, Yeong WY, Naing MW, 2016, Microvalve Bioprinting of Cellular Droplets with High Resolution and Consistency. Proceedings of the International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing, p397–402.

Koch L, Brandt O, Deiwick A, et al., 2017, Laser Assisted Bioprinting at Different Wavelengths and Pulse Durations with a Metal Dynamic Release Layer: Aa Parametric Study. Int J Bioprint, 3:42–53.

Guo F, Li P, French JB, et al., 2015, Controlling Cell-Cell Interactions Using Surface Acoustic Waves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112:43–8.

Choe YE, Kim GH, 2020, A PCL/Cellulose Coil-shaped Scaffold Via a Modified Electrohydrodynamic Jetting Process. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 15:403–16.

Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current Advances and Future Perspectives in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting. Biomaterials, 76:321–43.

Ng WL, Yeong WY, Naing MW, 2016, Development of Polyelectrolyte Chitosan-gelatin Hydrogels for Skin Bioprinting. Proc CIRP, 49:105–12.

Ng WL, Yeong WY, Naing MW, 2016, Polyelectrolyte Gelatin-chitosan Hydrogel Optimized for 3D Bioprinting in Skin Tissue Engineering. Int J Bioprint, 2:53–62.

Zhuang P, Ng WL, An J, et al., 2019, Layer-by-layer Ultraviolet Assisted Extrusion-Based (UAE) Bioprinting of Hydrogel Constructs with High Aspect Ratio for Soft Tissue Engineering Applications. PLoS One, 14:e0216776.

Ng WL, Yeong WY, Naing MW, 2014, Potential of Bioprinted Films for Skin Tissue Engineering. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing, p441–6.

Meng Z, He J, Li J, et al., 2020, Melt-based, Solvent-free Additive Manufacturing of Biodegradable Polymeric Scaffolds with Designer Microstructures for Tailored Mechanical/Biological Properties and Clinical Applications. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 15:417–44.

Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat Polymerization based Bioprinting-process, Materials, Applications and Regulatory Challenges. Biofabrication, 12:022001.

Li W, Mille LS, Robledo JA, et al., 2020, Recent Advances in Formulating and Processing Biomaterial Inks for Vat Polymerization-Based 3D Printing. Adv Healthc Mater, 9:2000156.

Nieto D, Corrales JA, de Mora AJ, et al., 2020, Fundamentals of Light-Cell-Polymer Interactions in Photo-cross-linking Based Bioprinting. APL Bioeng, 4:041502.

Gudupati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I, 2016, A Comprehensive Review on Droplet-based Bioprinting: Past, Present and Future. Biomaterials, 102:20–42.

Ng WL, Tan ZQ, Yeong WY, et al., 2018, Proof-of-concept: 3D Bioprinting of Pigmented Human Skin Constructs. Biofabrication, 10:025005.

Ng WL, Wang S, Yeong WY, et al., 2016, Skin Bioprinting: Impending Reality or Fantasy? Trends Biotechnol, 34:689–99.

Ng WL, Yeong WY, 2019, The Future of Skin Toxicology Testing 3D Bioprinting Meets Microfluidics. Int J Bioprint, 5:237.

Worthington AM, 1877, XXVIII. On the Forms Assumed by Drops of Liquids Falling Vertically on a Horizontal Plate. Proc R Soc London, 25:261–72.

Thoroddsen ST, Etoh TG, Takehara K, 2008, High-Speed Imaging of Drops and Bubbles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 40:257–85.

Lepowsky E, Muradoglu M, Tasoglu S, 2018, Towards Preserving Post-printing Cell Viability and Improving the Resolution: Past, Present, and Future of 3D Bioprinting Theory. Bioprinting, 11:e00034.

Tasoglu S, Kaynak G, Szeri AJ, et al., 2010, Impact of a Compound Droplet on a Flat Surface: A Model for Single Cell Epitaxy. Phys Fluids, 22:082103.

Nooranidoost M, Izbassarov D, Tasoglu S, et al., 2019, A Computational Study of Droplet-based Bioprinting: Effects of Viscoelasticity. Phys Fluids, 31:081901.

Hendriks J, Visser CW, Henke S, et al., 2015, Optimizing Cell Viability in Droplet-based Cell Deposition. Sci Rep, 5:11304.

Gorr HM, Zueger JM, McAdams DR, et al., 2013, Salt-induced Pattern Formation in Evaporating Droplets of Lysozyme Solutions. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 103:59–66.

Rutgers IR, 1962, Relative Viscosity of Suspensions of Rigid Spheres in Newtonian liquids. Rheol Acta, 2:202–10.

Ng WL, Yeong WY, Naing MW, 2017, Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Based Bio-Ink Improves Cell Viability and Homogeneity during Drop-On-Demand Printing. Materials, 10:190.

Xu C, Zhang M, Huang Y, et al., 2014, Study of Droplet Formation Process during Drop-on-Demand Ink jetting of Living Cell-Laden Bioink. Langmuir, 30:9130–8.

Dong L, Johnson D, 2003, Surface Tension of Charge stabilized Colloidal Suspensions at the Water Air Interface. Langmuir, 19:10205–9.

Jang D, Kim D, Moon J, 2009, Influence of Fluid Physical Properties on Ink-jet Printability. Langmuir, 25:2629–35.

Lee A, Sudau K, Ahn KH, et al., 2012, Optimization of Experimental Parameters to Suppress Nozzle Clogging in Inkjet Printing. Ind Eng Chem Res, 51:13195–204.

Srichan C, Saikrajang T, Lomas T, et al., 2009, Inkjet Printing PEDOT: PSS Using Desktop Inkjet Printer. 2009 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, IEEE, p465–8.

Derby B, Reis N, 2003, Inkjet Printing of Highly Loaded Particulate Suspensions. MRS Bull, 28:815–18.

Yarin AL, 2006, Drop Impact Dynamics: Splashing, Spreading, Receding, Bouncing. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 38:159–92.

Rioboo R, Tropea C, Marengo M, 2001, Outcomes from a Drop Impact on Solid Surfaces. Atomization Sprays, 11:155–66.

Josserand C, Thoroddsen ST, 2016, Drop Impact on a Solid Surface. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 48:365–91.

Stow CD, Hadfield MG, 1981, An Experimental Investigation of Fluid Flow Resulting from the Impact of a Water Drop with an Unyielding Dry Surface. Proc R Soc London A Math Phys Sci, 373:419–41.

Mundo C, Sommerfeld M, Tropea C, 1995, Droplet-wall Collisions: Experimental Studies of the Deformation and Breakup Process. Int J Multiphase Flow, 21:151–73.

Yarin AL, Weiss DA, 1995, Impact of Drops on Solid Surfaces: Self-similar Capillary Waves, and Splashing as a New Type of Kinematic Discontinuity. J Fluid Mech, 283:141–73.

Wal RL, Berger GM, Mozes SD, 2006, The Splash/Nonsplash Boundary Upon a Dry Surface and thin Fluid Film. Exp Fluids, 40:53–9.

Moreira AL, Moita AS, Panão MR, 2010, Advances and challenges in explaining fuel spray impingement: How much of single droplet impact research is useful? Prog Energy Combust Sci, 36:554–80.

Lee JB, Derome D, Guyer R, et al., 2016, Modeling the Maximum Spreading of Liquid Droplets Impacting Wetting and Nonwetting Surfaces. Langmuir, 32:1299–308.

Shaikeea AJ, Basu S, Tyagi A, et al., 2017, Universal Representations of Evaporation Modes in Sessile Droplets. PLoS One, 12:e0184997.

Goh GL, Saengchairat N, Agarwala S, et al., 2019, Sessile Droplets Containing Carbon Nanotubes: A Study of Evaporation Dynamics and CNT Alignment for Printed Electronics. Nanoscale, 11:10603–14.

Birdi K, Vu D, 1993, Wettability and the Evaporation Rates of Fluids from Solid Surfaces. J Adhes Sci Technol, 7:485–93.

Hu H, Larson RG, 2002, Evaporation of a Sessile Droplet on a Substrate. J Phys Chem B, 106:1334–44.

Maeno E, Takahashi N, Okada Y, Dysfunction of Regulatory Volume Increase is a Key Component of Apoptosis. FEBS Lett, 580:6513–7.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Ng, et al

License URL: