Advancing cancer research using bioprinting for tumor-on-a-chip platforms

Authors

  • Stephanie Knowlton Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
  • Ashwini Joshi Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
  • Bekir Yenilmez Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
  • Ibrahim Tarik Ozbolat Engineering Science and Mechanics Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA;The Huck Institute of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
  • Chee Kai Chua Singapore Centre for 3D Printing (SC3DP), School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore
  • Ali Khademhosseini Biomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA;Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Savas Tasoglu Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA;Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2016.02.003

Keywords:

bioprinting, cancer, tumor-on-a-chip, microfabrication, microfluidics, drug screening

Abstract

There is an urgent for a novel approach to cancer research with 1.7 million new cases of cancer occurring every year in the United States of America. Tumor models offer promise as a useful platform for cancer research without the need for animal models, but there remains a challenge to fabricate a relevant model which mimics the structure, function and drug response of human tumors. Bioprinting can address this need by fabricating three-dimensional constructs that mimic tumor heterogeneity, vasculature and spheroid structures. Furthermore, bioprinting can be used to fabricate tissue constructs within microfluidic platforms, forming “tumor-on-a-chip” devices which are ideal for high-throughput testing in a biomimetic microenvironment. Applications of tumors-on-a-chip include facilitating basic research to better understand tumor development, structure and function as well as drug screening to improve the efficiency of cancer drug discovery.

References

Cancer statistics n.d., viewed February 9, 2015, http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/what-is-cancer/statistics

Ridky T W, Chow J M, Wong D J, et al. 2010, Invasive three-dimensional organotypic neoplasia from multiple normal human epithelia. Nature Medicine, vol.16(12): 1450–1455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2265

Kim B J, Hannanta-anan P, Chau M, et al. 2013, Cooperative roles of SDF-1α and EGF gradients on tumor cell migration revealed by a robust 3D microfluidic model. PLoS One, vol.8(7): e68422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068422

Loessner D, Stok K S, Lutolf M P, et al. 2010, Bioengineered 3D platform to explore cell-ECM interactions and drug resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Biomaterials, vol.31(32): 8494–8506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.064

Zhao Y, Yao R, Ouyang L, et al. 2014, Three-dimensional printing of Hela cells for cervical tumor model in vitro. Biofabrication, vol.6(3): 035001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035001

Friedl P and Wolf K, 2010, Plasticity of cell migration: A multiscale tuning model. Journal of Cell Biology, vol.188(1): 11–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200909003

Li C L, Tian T, Nan K J, et al. 2008, Survival advantages of multicellular spheroids vs. monolayers of HepG2 cells in vitro. Oncology Reports, vol.20(6): 1465–1471. http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or_00000167

Chopra V, Dinh T V and Hannigan E V, 1997, Three-dimensional endothelial-tumor epithelial cell interac-tions in human cervical cancers. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Animal, vol.33(6): 432–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11626-997-0061-y

Knowlton S, Onal S, Chu H Y, et al. 2015, Bioprinting for cancer research. Trends in Biotechnology, vol.33(9): 504–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.007

Huh D, Hamilton G A and Ingber D E, 2011, From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends in Cell Biology, vol.21(12): 745–754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005

Huh D, Torisawa Y S, Hamilton G A, et al. 2012, Microengineered physiological biomimicry: organs-on- chips. Lab on a Chip, vol.12(12): 2156–2164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2lc40089h

Chang S F, Chang C A, Lee D-Y, et al. 2008, Tumor cell cycle arrest induced by shear stress: roles of integrins and Smad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol.105(10): 3927–3932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712353105

Polacheck W J, Charest J L and Kamm R D, 2011, Interstitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol.108(27): 11115–11120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103581108

Varani J, 1982, Chemotaxis of metastatic tumor cells.

Cancer Metastasis Reviews, vol.1(1): 17–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00049478

Ghaemmaghami A M, Hancock M J, Harrington H, et al. 2012, Biomimetic tissues on a chip for drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, vol.17(3–4): 173–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2011.10.02

Dababneh A B and Ozbolat I T, 2014, Bioprinting technology: A current state-of-the-art review. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol.136(6): 061016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4028512

Junttila M R and de Sauvage F J, 2013, Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response. Nature, vol.501(7467): 346–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12626

Xu F, Celli J, Rizvi I, et al. 2011, A three-dimensional in vitro ovarian cancer coculture model using a high-throughput cell patterning platform. Biotechnology Journal, vol.6(2): 204–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.201000340

Weiss L E, Amon C H, Finger E D, et al. 2005, Bayesian computer-aided experimental design of heterogeneous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Computer-Aided Design, vol.37(11): 1127–1139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2005.02.004

Keenan T M and Folch A, 2008, Biomolecular gradients in cell culture systems. Lab on a Chip, vol.8(1): 34–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B711887B

Nagy J A, Chang S H, Dvorak A M, et al. 2009, Why are tumour blood vessels abnormal and why is it important to know? British Journal of Cancer, vol.100(6): 865–869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604929

Huang T Q, Qu X, Liu J, et al. 2014, 3D printing of biomimetic microstructures for cancer cell migration. Biomedical Microdevices, vol.16(1): 127–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10544-013-9812-6

Chauhan V P, Stylianopoulous T, Martin J D, et al. 2012, Normalization of tumour blood vessels improves the de-livery of nanomedicines in a size-dependent manner. Nature Nanotechnology, vol.7(6): 383–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.45

Hirschhaeuser F, Menne H, Dittfeld C, et al. 2010, Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again. Journal of Biotechnology, vol.148(1): 3–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.01.012

Hribar K C, Finlay D, Ma X, et al. 2015, Nonlinear 3D projection printing of concave hydrogel microstructures for long-term multicellular spheroid and embryoid body culture. Lab on a Chip, vol.15(11): 2412–2418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5lc00159e

Vidi P A, Maleki T, Ochoa M, et al. 2014, Disease-on-a-chip: mimicry of tumor growth in mammary ducts. Lab on a Chip, vol.14(1): 172–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3lc50819f

Rizvi I, Gurkan U A, Tasoglu S, et al. 2013, Flow induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cellular heterogeneity and biomarker modulation in 3D ovarian cancer nodules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.110(22): E1974–E1983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216989110

Albanese A, Lam A K, Sykes E A, et al. 2013, Tumour-on-a-chip provides an optical window into nanoparticle tissue transport. Nature Communications, vol.4: 2718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3718

Kwak B, Ozcelikkale A, Shin C s, et al. 2014, Simulation of complex transport of nanoparticles around a tumor using tumor-microenvironment-on-chip. Journal of Controlled Release, vol.194: 157–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.08.027

Chang R, Nam J and Sun W, 2008, Direct cell writing of 3D microorgan for in vitro pharmacokinetic model. Tissue Engineering Part C Methods, vol.14(2): 157–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2007.0392

Snyder J, Son A R, Hamid Q, et al. 2015, Fabrication of microfluidic manifold by precision extrusion deposition and replica molding for cell-laden device. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol.138(4): 041007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4031551

Hamid Q, Wang C, Zhao Y, et al. 2014, A three-dimensional cell-laden microfluidic chip for in vitro drug metabolism detection. Biofabrication, vol.6(2): 025008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/025008

Hamid Q, Wang C, Synder J, et al. 2015, Maskless fabrication of cell-laden microfluidic chips with localized surface functionalization for the co-culture of cancer cells. Biofabrication, vol.7(1):015012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015012

An Uphill Battle, n.d., viewed February 18, 2016, http://www.brightfocus.org/sites/default/files/An%20Uphill%20Battle.jpg

PR Tufts CSDD 2014 Cost Study, 2014, viewed Febru-

ary 18, 2016, <http://csdd.tufts.edu/news/complete_story/pr_tufts_csdd_2014_cost_study>

Unger C, Kramer N, Walzl A, et al. 2014, Modeling human carcinomas: Physiologically relevant 3D models to improve anti-cancer drug development. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol.79–80: 50–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.015

Singh M, Morris C P, Ellis R J, et al. 2008, Micro-sphere-based seamless scaffolds containing macroscopic gradients of encapsulated factors for tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering Part C—Methods, vol.14(4): 299–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0167

He Z Q and Xiong L Z, 2011, Fabrication of poly(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres and degradation characteristics in vitro. Journal of Macromolecular Science Part B—Physics, vol.50(9): 1682–1690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222348.2010.543036

Bertassoni L E, Cardoso J C, Manoharan V, et al. 2014, Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels. Biofabrication, vol.6(2): 024105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105

Tasoglu S and Demirci U, 2013, Bioprinting for stem cell research. Trends in Biotechnology, vol.31(1): 10–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.10.005

Durmus N G, Tasoglu S and Demirci U, 2013, Bio-printing: functional droplet networks. Nature Materials, vol.12(6): 478–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat3665

Ozbolat I T and Yu Y, 2013, Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.60(3): 691–699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2243912

Kolesky D B, Truby R L, Gladman A S, et al. 2014, 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Advanced Materials, vol.26(19): 3124– 3130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506

Drug Discovery, 2015, InvivoSciences, viewed February 18, 2016, http://invivosciences.com/products-services/drug-discovery/

Downloads

Published

2016-06-22