Morphological, mechanical and biological assessment of PCL/pristine graphene scaffolds for bone regeneration

VIEWS - 809 (Abstract) 482 (PDF)
Weiguang Wang, Guilherme Ferreira Caetano, Wei-Hung Chiang, Ana Letícia Braz, Jonny James Blaker, Marco Andrey Cipriani Frade, Paulo Jorge Da Silva Bartolo

Abstract


Scaffolds are physical substrates for cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation, ultimately leading to the regeneration of tissues. They must be designed according to specific biomechanical requirements such as mechanical properties, surface characteristics, biodegradability, biocompatibility, and porosity. The optimal design of a scaffold for a specific tissue strongly depends on both materials and manufacturing processes. Polymeric scaffolds reinforced with electroactive particles could play a key role in tissue engineering by modulating cell proliferation and differentia-tion. This paper investigates the use of an extrusion additive manufacturing system to produce PCL/pristine graphene scaffolds for bone tissue applications. PCL/pristine graphene blends were prepared using a melt blending process. Scaffolds with regular and reproducible architecture were produced with different concentrations of pristine graphene. Scaffolds were evaluated from morphological, mechanical, and biological view. The results suggest that the addition of pristine graphene improves the mechanical performance of the scaffolds, reduces the hydrophobicity, and improves cell viability and proliferation.


Keywords


biofabrication; human adipose-derived stem cells; poly (ε-caprolactone); pristine graphene; scaffolds; tissue engineering

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lee J, Farag M M, Park E K, et al., 2014, A simultaneous process of 3D magnesium phosphate scaffold fabrication and bioactive substance loading for hard tissue regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol.36: 252–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.12.007

Lichte P, Pape H C, Pufe T, et al., 2011, Scaffolds for bone healing: concepts, materials and evidence. Injury, vol.42(6): 569–573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.033

Tang D, Tare R S, Yang L Y, et al., 2016, Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration. Biomaterials, vol.83: 363–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024

Wang W, Chiang W H and Bartolo P J, 2016, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing, May 16-19, 2016: Design, fa-

brication and evaluation of PCL/graphene scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, et al., 2014, Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol.9(1): 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-18

Denry I and Kuhn L T, 2016, Design and characterization of calcium phosphate ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Dental Materials, vol.32(1): 43–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.008

Fiedler T, Videira A C, Bártolo P, et al., 2013, On the mechanical properties of PLC–bioactive glass scaffolds fabricated via BioExtrusion. Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol.57: 288–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.063

Sousa I, Mendes A, Pereira R F, et al., 2014, Collagen surface modified poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds with improved hydrophilicity and cell adhesion properties. Materials Letters, vol.134: 263–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.132

Santos A R C, Almeida H A and Bártolo P J, 2013, Additive manufacturing techniques for scaffold-based cartilage tissue engineering. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol.8(3): 175–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2013.838825

Bartolo P J, Kruth J P, Silva J, et al., 2012, Biomedical production of implants by additive electrochemical and physical processes. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, vol.61(2): 635–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.005

Bártolo P J, Chua C K, Almeida H A, et al., 2009, Biomanufacturing for tissue engineering: present and future trends. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol.4(4): 203– 216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452750903476288

Fantini M, Curto M and De Crescenzio F, 2016, A method to design biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering based on Voronoi lattices. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol.11(2): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1172301

Lee J M and Yeong W Y, 2015, A preliminary model of time-pressure dispensing system for bioprinting based on printing and material parameter. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol.10(1): 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2014.979557

Dean D, Mott E, Luo X, et al., 2014, Multiple initiators and dyes for continuous digital light processing (cDLP) additive manufacture of resorbable bone tissue engineering. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol.9(1): 3–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2013.873337

Kumar A, Mandal S, Barui S, et al., 2016. Low temperature additive manufacturing of three dimensional scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering applications: Processing related challenges and property assessment. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, vol.103: 1–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2016.01.001

Caetano G, Violante R, Sant′Ana A B, et al., 2016, Cellularized versus decellularized scaffolds for bone regeneration. Materials Letters. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.05.152

Jin G and Li K, 2014, The electrically conductive scaffold as the skeleton of stem cell niche in regenerative medicine. Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol.45: 671–681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.06.004

Lu L, Mende M, Yang X, et al., 2012, Design and validation of a bioreactor for simulating the cardiac niche: A system incorporating cyclic stretch, electrical stimulation, and constant perfusion. Tissue Engineering Part A, vol.19(3–4): 403–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0135

Maidhof R, Tandon N, Lee E J, et al., 2012, Biomimetic perfusion and electrical stimulation applied in concert improved the assembly of engineered cardiac tissue. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol.6(10): e12–e23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.525

Kuilla T, Bhadra S, Yao D, et al., 2010, Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Progress in Polymer Science, vol.35(11): 1350–1375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005

Li M, Guo Y, Wei Y, et al., 2006, Electrospinning polyaniline-contained gelatin nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials, vol.27(13): 2705– 2715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.037

Kumar S, Azam D, Raj S, et al., 2016, 3D scaffold alters cellular response to graphene in a polymer composite for orthopedic applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol.104(4): 732–749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33549

Wang J K, Xiong G M, Zhu M, et al., 2015, Polymer-enriched 3D graphene foams for biomedical applications. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol.7(15): 8275–8283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b01440

Liao K H, Lin Y S, Macosko C W, et al., 2011, Cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and graphene in human erythrocytes and skin fibroblasts. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol.3(7): 2607–2615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/am200428v

Wang K, Ruan J, Song H, et al., 2011, Biocompatibility of graphene oxide. Nanoscale Research Letters, vol.6(1):

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11671-010-9751-6

Zhang Y, Ali S F, Dervishi E, et al., 2010, Cytotoxicity effects of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes in neural phaeochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells. ACS Nano, vol.4(6): 3181–3186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn1007176

Park S Y, Park J, Sim S H, et al., 2011, Enhanced differentiation of human neural stem cells into neurons on graphene. Advanced Materials, vol.23(36): H263–H267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201101503

Li N, Zhang X, Song Q, et al., 2011, The promotion of neurite sprouting and outgrowth of mouse hippocampal cells in culture by graphene substrates. Biomaterials, vol.32(35): 9374–9382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.065

Woodruff M A and Hutmacher D W, 2010, The return of a forgotten polymer — polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Progress in Polymer Science, vol.35(10): 1217– 1256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002

Sasmazel H T, 2011, Novel hybrid scaffolds for the cultivation of osteoblast cells. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol.49(4): 838–846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.07.022

Caetano G F, Bártolo P J, Domingos M, et al., 2015, Osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells into Polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold. Procedia Engineering, vol.110: 59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.010

Zhang H X, Du G H and Zhang J T, 2004, Assay of mitochondrial functions by resazurin in vitro. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol.25(3): 385–389.

Borra R C, Lotufo M A, Gagioti S M, et al., 2009, A simple method to measure cell viability in proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. Brazilian Oral Research, vol.23(3): 255–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000300006

Vega-Avila E and Pugsley M K, 2011, An overview of colorimetric assay methods used to assess survival or proliferation of mammalian cells. Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society, vol.54: 10–14.

Poh P S P, Hutmacher D W, Holzapfel B M, et al., 2016, In vitro and in vivo bone formation potential of surface calcium phosphate-coated polycaprolactone and polycaprolactone/bioactive glass composite scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia, vol.30: 319–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.012

Bártolo P J, Domingos M, Patrício T, et al., 2011, Bio-fabrication strategies for tissue engineering, in Fernandes P R and Bártolo P J, (eds) Advances on Modeling in Tissue Engineering, Springer, Netherlands, 137–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1254-6




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2016.02.009

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Recent Articles | About Journal | For Author | Fees | About Whioce

Copyright © Whioce Publishing Pte Ltd. All Rights Reserved.