Personalised Anaesthetic Patches for Dental Applications

Yi-Hsuan Ou, Yi-Hui Ou, Jing Gu, Lifeng Kang

Article ID: 203
Vol 5, Issue 2.1, 2019, Pages 15-21

VIEWS - 298 (Abstract) 183 (PDF)


Topical anesthetics are widely used in dental procedures. However, most commercially available medications are in the form of liquid or semisolid, which cannot provide prolonged effect intraorally. To address this issue, we proposed the use of three-dimensional printing (3DP) to fabricate a customizable dental anesthetic patch loaded with lidocaine that can be fitted perfectly onto the affected tooth. It has been shown that that patch can adhere on the tooth for more than 1 h, while releasing lidocaine from the patch made of hydrogels. In addition, the results illustrated the possibility of controlling the drug release profile by altering the shape of the patch, as well the use of a 3DP tooth model as the drug testing platform. Taken together, these data further reinforce the vast potential of the application of 3DP technology in personalized medicine.


Dental patch; topical anesthetics; three-dimensional printing; personalized medicine; adhesive; drug release

Full Text:



Armfield JM, Milgrom P, 2011, A Clinician Guide to Patients

Afraid of Dental Injections and Numbness. SAAD Dig, 27:33-9.

Lee HS, 2016, Recent Advances in Topical Anesthesia.

J Dent Anesth Pain Med, 16(4):237. DOI 10.17245/


Oni G, Brown S, Kenkel J, 2012, Comparison of Five

Commonly-available, Lidocaine-containing Topical

Anesthetics and their Effect on Serum Levels of Lidocaine and

Its Metabolite Monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX). Aesthet

Surg J, 32(4):495-503. DOI 10.1177/1090820X12442672.

Muniz BV, Baratelli D, Carla SD, et al., 2018, Hybrid

Hydrogel Composed of Polymeric Nanocapsules Co-loading

Lidocaine and Prilocaine for Topical Intraoral Anesthesia. Sci

Rep, 8(1):17972. DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-36382-4.

Ueda HMC, Shah VP, Derdzinski K, et al., 2009, Topical

and Transdermal Drug Products. U S Pharmacopeial Natl

Formul, 35(3):750-64.

Nguyen S, Hiorth M, 2015, Advanced Drug Delivery

Systems for Local Treatment of the Oral Cavity. Ther Deliv,

(5):595-608. DOI 10.4155/tde.15.5.

Silvers SL, 2014, Practical Techniques in Office-based

Balloon Sinus Dilation. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Neck Surg,

(2):206-12. DOI 10.1016/j.otot.2014.02.012.

Soweid AM, Yaghi SR, Jamali FR, et al., 2011, Posterior

Lingual Lidocaine: A Novel Method to Improve Tolerance

in upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. World J. Gastroenterol,

(47):5191. DOI 10.3748/wjg.v17.i47.5191.

Schubert C, van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA, 2014,

Innovations in 3D Printing: A 3D Overview from Optics

to Organs. Br J. Ophthalmol, 98(2):159-61. DOI 10.1136/


Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J, et al., 2016, 3D Scanning

and 3D Printing as Innovative Technologies for Fabricating

Personalized Topical Drug Delivery Systems. J Control

Release, 234:41-8. DOI 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.034.

Liang K, Carmone S, Brambilla D, et al., 2018, 3D Printing

of a Wearable Personalized Oral Delivery Device: A First-in-

Human study. Sci Adv, 4(5):2544. DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aat2544.

Lim SH, Kathuria H, Tan JJY, et al., 2018, 3D Printed

Drug Delivery and Testing Systems a Passing Fad or the

Future? Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 132:139-68. DOI 10.1016/j.


Kumar H, Prakash A, Sarma P, et al., Three-dimensional

Drugs: A New Era in the Pharmaceutical Development. Indian

J Pharmacol, 49(6):417-8. DOI 10.4103/ijp.IJP_119_18.

Jassim-Jaboori AH, Oyewumi MO, 2015, 3D Printing

Technology in Pharmaceutical Drug Delivery: Prospects

and Challenges. J Biomol Res Ther, 4:4. DOI 10.4172/2167-


Palo M, Holländer J, Suominen J, et al., 3D Printed Drug

Delivery Devices: Perspectives and Technical Challenges 3D

Printed Drug Delivery Devices: Perspectives and Technical

Challenges. Expert Rev Med Devices, 14(9):685-96. DOI


Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M, et al., 2018, 3D Printing

in Pharmaceutical and Medical Applications Recent

Achievements and Challenges. Pharm Res, 35(9):176. DOI


Goyanes A, Martinez PR, Basit AW, 2015, Effect of

Geometry on Drug Release from 3D Printed Tablets. Int J

Pharm, 494(2):657-63. DOI 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.04.069.

Scherer MD, 2019, Lower Dental Tooth Model. NIH 3D Print

Exchange. Available from:

discover/3dpx-003003. [Last accessed on 2019 Jan 24].

Scherer MD, 2015, Implementing a Contemporary, In-office

Fully Digital Workflow in a Clinical Implant Practice: Intraoral

Scanning, Virtual Design, and 3D printing. Implant Pract US,


Mesnukul A, Yodkhum K, Phaechamud T, 2009, Solid

Dispersion Matrix Tablet Comprising Indomethacin-PEGHPMC

Fabricated with Fusion and Mold Technique. Indian J

Pharm Sci, 71(4):413-20. DOI 10.4103/0250-474X.57290.

Liawruangrath S, Liawruangrath B, Pibool P, 2001,

Simultaneous Determination of Tolperisone and Lidocaine by

High Performance Liquid Chromatography. J Pharm Biomed

Anal, 26(5-6):865-72. DOI 10.1016/S0731-7085(01)00462-9.

Reynolds TD, Mitchell SA, Balwinski KM, 2002,

Investigation of the Effect of Tablet Surface Area/Volume

on Drug Release from Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose

Controlled-release Matrix Tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm,

(4):457-66. DOI 10.1081/DDC-120003007.

Siepmann J, Kranz H, Bodmeier R, et al., 1999, HPMCMatrices

for Controlled Drug Delivery: A New Model

Combining Diffusion, Swelling, and Dissolution Mechanisms

and Predicting the Release Kinetics. Pharm Res, 16(11):1748-

DOI 10.1023/A:1018914301328.

Siepmann J, Kranz H, Peppas NA, et al., 2000, Calculation

of the Required Size and Shape of Hydroxypropyl

Methylcellulose Matrices to Achieve Desired Drug Release

Profiles. Int J Pharm, 201(2):151-64. DOI 10.1016/S0378-


Bhushan NVV, Nayak RN, 2010, A Comparison of the

Efficacy of Topical Application of Lignocaine Hydrochloride

% gel and Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 5% gel for Extraction

of Teeth. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 9(2):119-26. DOI 10.1007/


Ghosal K, Chakrabarty S, Nanda A, 2011, Hydroxypropyl

Methylcellulose in Drug Delivery. Pharm Sin, 2(2):152-68.

Reddy PC, Chaitanya KSC, Rao YM, 2011, A Review on

Bioadhesive Buccal Drug Delivery Systems: Current Status of

Formulation and Evaluation Methods. Daru, 19(6):385-403.

Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, et al., 2017, Intraoral

Scanners in Dentistry: A Review of the Current Literature. BMC

Oral Health, 17(1): 149. DOI 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x.

Kimber JA, Kazarian SG, Štěpánek F, 2013, DEM Simulation of

Drug Release from Structurally Heterogeneous Swelling Tablets.

Powder Technol, 248:68-76. DOI 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.12.039.

Gittings S, Turnbull N, Henry B, et al., 2015, Characterisation

of Human Saliva as a Platform for Oral Dissolution Medium

Development. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 91:16-24. DOI


Gittings S, Turnbull N, Roberts CJ, et al., 2014, Dissolution

Methodology for Taste Masked Oral Dosage Forms. J Control

Release, 173:32-42. DOI 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.10.030.

Sohi H, Ahuja A, Ahmad FJ, et al., 2010, Critical

Evaluation of Permeation Enhancers for Oral Mucosal

Drug Delivery Permeation Enhancers for Oral Mucosal

Drug Delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 36(3):254-82. DOI


Fenoll-Palomares C, Muñoz Montagud JV, Sanchiz V,

et al., 2004, Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate, pH and buffer

Capacity of Saliva in Healthy Volunteers. Rev Esp Enferm Dig,

(11):773-83. DOI 10.4321/S1130-01082004001100005.

Young JL, Bogner RH, 2009, Case Report: Lidocaine

Mucoadhesive Buccal Tablets for Local Relief of Mouth

Ulcers. Int J Pharm Compd, 13(3):214-7.

Okamoto H, Nakamori T, Arakawa Y, et al., 2002, Development

of Polymer Film Dosage Forms of Lidocaine for Buccal

Administration: II. Comparison of Preparation Methods.

J Pharm Sci, 91(11):2424-32. DOI 10.1002/jps.10228.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Yi-Hsuan Ou, Yi-Hui Ou, Jing Gu, Lifeng Kang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.