Uncovering 3D bioprinting research trends: A keyword network mapping analysis

VIEWS - 1791 (Abstract) 408 (PDF)
Leonardo Azael Garcia-Garcia, Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador


A scientometric analysis as part of a Competitive Technology Intelligence methodology was used to determine the main research efforts in 3D bioprinting. Papers from Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) published between 2000 and 2017 were analysed. A network map of the most frequently occurring keywords in these articles was created, and their average publication year (APY) was determined. The analysis focused on the most relevant keywords that occurred at least five times. A total of 1,759 keywords were obtained, and a co-occurrence analysis was developed for APYs with more keywords: 2011–2016. The results indicated that Polylactic Acid (PLA) is the material used most often. Applications mainly focused on bone tissue engineering and regeneration. The most frequently used technique was inkjet printing, and the main cell sources were Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC). From a general perspective, ‘Treatment’ and ‘Bioink’ were the most frequent keywords. The former was mainly related to cancer, regenerative medicine, and MSC and the latter, to multicellular spheroid deposition and the use of hydrogels like GelMA (gelatin methacryloyl). This analysis provides insights to stakeholders involved in 3D bioprinting research and development who need to keep abreast of scientific progress in the field.


scientometric analysis; data mining; competitive technology intelligence

Full Text:



Ventola C L, 2014, Medical applications for 3D printing: Current and projected uses. P T, 39(10): 704–711. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189697

Banks J, 2013, Adding value in additive manufacturing. IEEE Pulse, 4(6): 22–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mpul.2013.2279617

Paterson A M, Bibb R, Campbell R I, et al., 2015, Comparing additive manufacturing technologies for customised wrist splints. Rapid Prototyp J, 21(3): 230–245.http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2013-0099

Tan X, Kok Y, Tan Y J , et al., 2015, Graded microstructure and mechanical properties of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V via electron beam melting. Acta Materialia, 97: 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.036

Kolesky D B, Truby R L, Gladman A S, et al., 2014, 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater, 26(19): 3124–3130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506

Murphy S V, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32(8): 773–785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958

Derby B, 2012, Printing and prototyping of tissue and scaffolds. Science, 16(338): 921–927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1226340

Pati F, Jang J, Ha D H, et al., 2014, Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun, 5: 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4935

Chatzinikolaidou M, 2016, Cell spheroids: The new frontiers in in vitro models for cancer drug validation. Drug Discov Today, 21(9): 1553–1560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.06.024

Ozbolat I T, 2016, 3D bioprinting: Fundamentals, principles and applications. Academic Press.

Small H, 1973, Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol, 24(4): 265–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406

He Q, 1999, Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1): 133–159.

Trappey A J C, Trappey C V, Lee K L C, 2017, Tracing the evolution of biomedical 3D printing technology using ontology-based patent concept analysis. Technol Anal Strateg Manag, 29(4): 339–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1211267

Rodríguez S M, Hernández de Menéndez A M, Arcos Novillo D A, 2016, Additive manufacturing: Importance and challenges for Latin America, in Anticipating future innovation pathways through large data analysis, Springer, New York, 249–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39056-7_14

Rodríguez-Salvador M, Rio-Belver R M, Garechana-Anacabe G, 2017, Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting. PLoS One, 12(6): e0180375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180375

Elsevier B V, 2016, Scopus: Content coverage guide, viewed 10 November 2015, Avaliable from: https://www.elsevier.com/data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/scopus_content_coverage_guide.pdf

Norotte C, Marga F S, Niklason L E, et al., 2009, Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials, 30(30): 5910–5917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034

Melchels F P W, Domingos M A N, Klein T J, et al., 2012, Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Prog Polym Sci, 37(8): 1079–1104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007

Malda J, Visser J, Melchels F P, et al., 2013, 25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater, 25(36): 5011–5028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302042

Kang H W, Lee S J, Ko I K, et al., 2016, A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol, 34(3): 312–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413

Jakab K, Norotte C, Marga F, et al., 2017, Tissue engineering by self-assembly and bio-printing of living cells. Biofabrication, 2(2): 022001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/2/022001

Duan B, Hockaday L A, Kang K H, et al., 2013, 3D bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A, 101A(5): 1255–1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34420

Tunkelang D, 2014, Web of science quick reference manual. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2618145

Van Eck N J, Waltman L, 2017, VOSviewer manual. Avaliable from: http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf

Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M, 2009, Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Third international AAAI conference on weblogs social media. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.010033

Leydesdorff L, Rafols I, 2012, Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data. J Informetr, 6(2): 318–332.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.003

Akhtar N, 2014, Social network analysis tools. in Proceedings-2014 4th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, CSNT 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CSNT.2014.83

Heymann S, Le Grand B, 2013, Visual analysis of complex networks for business intelligence with Gephi. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IV.2013.39

Shi P, Yong T, Edgar S, et al., 2017, Hybrid three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of retina equivalent for ocular research. International Journal of Bioprinting, 3(2): 138–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.02.008

Sriphutkiat Y, Kasetsirikul S, Zhou Y, 2018, Formation of cell spheroids using standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW). International Journal of Bioprinting, 4(1): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v4i1.130

Nguyen D, Hgg D A, Forsman A, et al., 2017, Cartilage tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of iPS cells in a nanocellulose/alginate bioink. Sci Rep, 7(1): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00690-y

Barbuzano J, 2017, Organoids: A new window into disease, development and discovery. viewed 6 June 2018. Avaliable from: https://hsci.harvard.edu/organoids

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v4i2.147


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Leonardo Azael Garcia-Garcia and Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.